In what way did the French colonies in the New World differ from those in England?
In what way did the French colonies in the New World differ from those in England? The french were more likely to establish trading posts among the Indians. The citizens of the English colonies elected their representatives. Establishing the Dominion of New England.
What were the differences between the Spanish French and English colonies?
France and Spain, for instance, were governed by autocratic sovereigns whose rule was absolute; their colonists went to America as servants of the Crown. The English colonists, on the other hand, enjoyed far more freedom and were able to govern themselves as long as they followed English law and were loyal to the king.
What was the difference between French and English settlements quizlet?
The English built settlements, raised their families there, and cultivated the land for farming, while the French only colonized lands for the purpose of trading.
How did the French presence in North America differ from that of the English?
How did the French and British differ in their efforts to gain control in North America? The British, who were present in large numbers, sometimes treated the Native Americans harshly and allowed settlers to take Native American lands. However, the French, with fewer settlers, wanted the Native Americans as allies.
How did the French colonists of the Americas differ from the Spanish and English colonists?
France and Spain for instance were governed by autocratic sovereigns whose rule was absolute their colonists went to America as servants of the Crown. The English colonists on the other hand enjoyed far more freedom and were able to govern themselves as long as they followed English law and were loyal to the king.
What was a difference between British and French approaches to colonialism answers?
According to this view, French colonial administration was very centralized and based on assimilation of colonial territories with France, while British colonial administration was much more decentralized, based upon cooperation with local chiefs.
How did British and French North America differ from other European colonies?
Compare British and French North America with other European colonies. British settlers wanted to flee religious persecution and french settlements were planned to establish large manorial estates. Both established permanent settlements while the south american colonies were more temporary for monetary benefits.
What was the basic difference between French and English attitude?
What was the basic difference between french and English attitudes about the land they acquired in north america? The French came to be fur traders and travel and work with the Indians. The British came to farm to give anal to native Indians.
Which statement best describes a difference between the English and the French?
Which statement best describes the difference between French and English colonies in North America? The French established small trading posts funded by a king, while the English created large, privately financed colonies.
How did the French differ from the English in their relations with the Native Americans?
English settlers were more interested in acquiring Native American lands, while Dutch and French colonists generally developed amicable relations with neighboring Native Americans in order to maintain a prosperous fur trade.
How did colonization in North America differ between the French and British?
The British colonies were developed economically as compared to French and Spanish colonies. The French colonies were sparsely populated. They were mainly used to promote trade with the Indians for fur. The English and French colonies were densely populated, and the citizens were more civilized.
How did the French settlers approach colonization in the New World differently from the Spanish?
How did the French settlers approach colonization in the New World differently from the Spanish? They sought to make alliances with the native peoples instead of subjugating them.
How did the French and the Spanish explorers differ in their approach to the New World?
Spanish settlers tried to assimilate American Indians, while French settlers learned their customs. B. Spanish settlers traded peacefully with American Indians, while French settlers forced them into slave labor.
How did French and British colonial rule differ in Africa?
The French operated a federal system where all the territories in West Africa were administered as one whole from the centre in Dakar. The British on the other hand allowed each territory to operate as a separate entity. The governors in the territories were had room act based on the situation of the ground.
How were British colonial policies in Africa different from the French?
The British had a primarily commercial approach to colonisation; acquisitions were often driven by private companies – the flag followed the trade. The French case was the opposite: the state decided to build an empire reaching from Algeria to Senegal and the Congo through military conquest.
What was one major difference between England’s colonies and those of other European powers like the Spanish and the French?
What was one major difference between England's colonies and those of other European powers like the Spanish and the French? England's colonies attracted a much larger number of permanent settlers. You just studied 41 terms!
How did French and English colonies in the Americas differ?
How did English colonists differ from Spanish or French colonists? Spanish and French colonist were olny going to the americas for fur trads,gold and silver. England went there to get religious freedom and land.
How did the French presence in North America differ from that of the English quizlet?
How did the French presence in North America differ from that of the English? France extended influence through exploration and commerce. What was the significance of the Stono rebellion? It was the largest slave revolt in British North America.
What was one major difference between French and British colonies in the Americas during the 1700s?
British colonies had more people, but French colonies had more land. What was one major difference between French and British colonists in the Americas during the 1700's? French colonists generally had friendlier relations with American Indians.
How did the French style of governing colonies compare to the British?
France ruled their colonies with Direct Rule using officials and soldiers from France to administer their colonies. Britain used Indirect Rule using Sultans Chiefs or other local rulers to govern their colonies.
What is the difference between British indirect rule and French direct rule?
In indirect rule, the British officials did not extert their influence directly to tbe people but through local chiefs, whereas in policy of assimilation, French officials exerted their influence directly to the people not through the local chiefs.
What were the differences between the British policy of indirect rule and the French policy of assimilation?
In indirect rule, the British officials did not extert their influence directly to tbe people but through local chiefs, whereas in policy of assimilation, French officials exerted their influence directly to the people not through the local chiefs.
How was the government of France similar to and different from the English government in the 1600s?
How were the central characteristics of the English and French governments of the late 1600's similar or different? France had an absolute monarchy, and England had a constitutional monarchy AND Parliament. The people of the English monarchy didn't have as much power because they split up the power.
What was the major difference between the British and French colonial administrative policies in Africa?
The French operated a federal system where all the territories in West Africa were administered as one whole from the centre in Dakar. The British on the other hand allowed each territory to operate as a separate entity. The governors in the territories were had room act based on the situation of the ground.
What is the difference between the British and the French system of administration in Africa?
The French operated a federal system where all the territories in West Africa were administered as one whole from the centre in Dakar. The British on the other hand allowed each territory to operate as a separate entity. The governors in the territories were had room act based on the situation of the ground.
What were the different ways the British and French control their colonies?
The French practiced direct rule. They sent oficials and soldiers from France to rule the colony. There goal was to impose culture on natives. The British on the other hand relied on indirect rule.
How did the French and British colonies in North America differ?
The British colonies were developed economically as compared to French and Spanish colonies. The French colonies were sparsely populated. They were mainly used to promote trade with the Indians for fur. The English and French colonies were densely populated, and the citizens were more civilized.
What is the difference between French and British colonial rule?
The French adopted direct rule while the British adopted indirect rule system. The French policy of assimilation was primarily aimed at creating French citizens out of her colonies. The British, on the other hand, did not pursue such policies. The British indirect rule was a system of administrative decentralisation.
What was the difference between the French and British governance in their empires?
Why the difference — it has been said that "Britain placed its emphasis on law under which independence is a status never to be compromised" "while France placed its emphasis on language and culture so that the link with the metropolitan power has never been broken".