What did we learn from the Little Albert Experiment?

What did we learn from the Little Albert Experiment?

The Little Albert Experiment demonstrated that classical conditioning—the association of a particular stimulus or behavior with an unrelated stimulus or behavior—works in human beings. In this experiment, a previously unafraid baby was conditioned to become afraid of a rat.

What is the significance of Watson study with Little Albert?

The Little Albert experiment was a controlled experiment showing empirical evidence of classical conditioning in humans. The study also provides an example of stimulus generalization. It was carried out by John B. Watson and his graduate student, Rosalie Rayner, at Johns Hopkins University.

What did Watson teach Little Albert?

In addition to demonstrating that emotional responses could be conditioned in humans, Watson and Rayner also observed that stimulus generalization had occurred. 2 After conditioning, Albert feared not just the white rat, but a wide variety of similar white objects as well.

What did Watson’s Little Albert Experiment quizlet?

Terms in this set (2) Watson & Rayner's (1920) experiment on 'Little Albert' demonstrated that classical conditioning principles could be applied to condition the emotional response of fear.

What was the conclusion of the Little Albert experiment?

The outcome of John Watson's Little Albert experiment was that classical conditioning is possible in humans, since the boy learned to associate a neutral stimulus (white rat) with a fearful stimulus (loud bang) to be scared of the white rat.

What does the story of Baby Albert demonstrate about ethics?

What does the story of Baby Albert demonstrate? Early experiments on children don't fit today's standards of ethical treatment.

How did Watson demonstrate that fear could be learned?

He had learned to associate fear with the presence of rats through the process of classical conditioning. This response generalised to other previously neutral stimuli that were similar to the rat and which he previously had liked. He now also showed fear of furry toys, a fur coat and a Father Christmas mask.

What did the results of the Little Albert experiment indicate about human response quizlet?

In addition to demonstrating that emotional responses could be conditioned in humans, Watson and Rayner also observed that stimulus generalization had occurred. After conditioning, Albert feared not just the white rat, but a wide variety of similar white objects as well.

Why was Little Albert removed from the experiment?

Watson had originally planned to decondition Albert out of his fear of rats, in order to demonstrate that conditioned fears could be eliminated. Albert was removed from the experiment by his mother prior to this happening, which means that the experiment left a child with a fear that he did not previously had.

What is the primary conclusion John B Watson’s made after working with Little Albert?

What is the primary conclusion John B. Watson's made after working with Little Albert? Emotions can be a conditioned response.

What does Little Albert predict?

What would you predict about Little Albert based on principle of spontaneous recovery? Little Albert would eventually forget about his fear to the white rat, sealskin coat, rabbit, and the dog.

What was the conditioned response in Watson’s Little Albert study?

In Watson's experiment with Little Albert, the white rat was the (conditioned, unconditioned) stimulus, and Albert's crying when the hammer struck the steel bar was the (conditioned, unconditioned) response.