What was used to justify Western expansion?
Before the American Civil War the idea of Manifest Destiny was used to validate continental acquisitions in the Oregon Country, Texas, New Mexico, and California. Later it was used to justify the purchase of Alaska and annexation of Hawaii.
Do you think he believed that U.S. expansion in the 1800s was justifiable?
Do you think he believed that U.S. expansion in the 1800s was justifiable? Why or why not? John Gast did not like the U.S. expansion because he shows how the Native Americans and animals being made to move west.
What were the 5 reasons for westward expansion?
| What were 5 reasons for westward expansion? | free land railroad gold and silver adventure and opportunity cattle |
|---|---|
| What were some challenges the cowboys faced on the long drive? | Violent storms, wind, rain, moving rivers, stampedes, rustlers, hot sun, discrimination, and 15 hours on the saddle |
What were the benefits of westward expansion?
Gold rush and mining opportunities (silver in Nevada) The opportunity to work in the cattle industry; to be a “cowboy” Faster travel to the West by railroad; availability of supplies due to the railroad. The opportunity to own land cheaply under the Homestead Act.
How justifiable was US expansion in the 1800s quizlet?
Chapter 15 Essay Question: How justifiable was the US expansion in the 1800s? LA purchase – Jefferson sent someone over to France to negotiation the New Orleans port, but they sold them the whole territory. Yes it was justifiable because it doubled the land. Florida – Slaves and Indians sneaking in and out.
Why Manifest Destiny was justified?
The philosophy drove 19th-century U.S. territorial expansion and was used to justify the forced removal of Native Americans and other groups from their homes. The rapid expansion of the United States intensified the issue of slavery as new states were added to the Union, leading to the outbreak of the Civil War.
How was manifest destiny justified?
The philosophy drove 19th-century U.S. territorial expansion and was used to justify the forced removal of Native Americans and other groups from their homes. The rapid expansion of the United States intensified the issue of slavery as new states were added to the Union, leading to the outbreak of the Civil War.
What were the benefits of moving West?
Gold rush and mining opportunities (silver in Nevada) The opportunity to work in the cattle industry; to be a “cowboy” Faster travel to the West by railroad; availability of supplies due to the railroad. The opportunity to own land cheaply under the Homestead Act.
Was westward expansion positive or negative?
The Westward expansion gave America a chance to expand its territory, while having a chance double the land area of the United States also increased goods, services and wealth but more importantly it gave Americans …show more content…
Was US expansion into the Louisiana Purchase justifiable?
This made the Purchase of the Louisiana Territory completely justifiable, as well as the treaty over Oregon and Florida. The Constitution also states that Congress has the power to levy war and trade/exchange with other countries.
What were the hardships and motivations for moving West?
They often had broken axels on their wagons, all different kinds of accidents, bad weather, rough river crossings, a limited food supply, people and animals dying of sickness and diseases, bandits who robbed them, and/or unfriendly Native Americans. The trip was especially difficult on women and children.
Was the US expansion justified?
Expansion abroad was good because it improved the United States' economy. Expansion abroad was justified because the United States was able spread its democratic values overseas. The United States expansion abroad was bad because it was based on the economic exploitation of people and resources from other countries.
Was America justified with Manifest Destiny?
The term "Manifest Destiny" was, in part, an expression of a genuine ideal on the part of Americans. But it was also a justification, in that they wanted territory and needed an excuse or justification for a push into territory that they did not control.
Why was the Manifest Destiny not justified?
Albert Gallatin opposed "Manifest Destiny" because he believed it conflicted with the idea of democracy. Many who supported the movement insisted that Americans possessed hereditary superiority. According to Gallatin, democracy is founded on the principle that no man is born with the right of governing another man.
Why was westward expansion a bad thing?
One of the drawbacks of U.S. territorial expansion was the proliferation of slavery. Although the Americans made a promise that they will not be taking the land of other people, like the Native Americans, without their consent and other than through peaceful means, history showed that this did not really happen.
Why was the Louisiana Purchase hypocritical?
The general opinion of many Americans at the time of the purchase was that Jefferson was being hypocritical by going through with it. Jefferson was known to have a strict interpretation of the Constitution and believed the president only had the powers the Constitution gave him.
What were the benefits of moving west?
Gold rush and mining opportunities (silver in Nevada) The opportunity to work in the cattle industry; to be a “cowboy” Faster travel to the West by railroad; availability of supplies due to the railroad. The opportunity to own land cheaply under the Homestead Act.
Why was Manifest Destiny justified?
The term "Manifest Destiny" was, in part, an expression of a genuine ideal on the part of Americans. But it was also a justification, in that they wanted territory and needed an excuse or justification for a push into territory that they did not control.
What were the pros and cons of Manifest Destiny?
Pros and Cons of Manifest Destiny
- What is Manifest Destiny?
- Pro: Overall Great Gain in Land.
- Pro: Mexican American War.
- Pro: Jobs Gained.
- Con: Slave Controversy.
- Con: The Mexican American War.
- Con: Native Conflicts.
Was the Westward Expansion positive or negative?
The Westward expansion gave America a chance to expand its territory, while having a chance double the land area of the United States also increased goods, services and wealth but more importantly it gave Americans …show more content…
Was the Westward Expansion good or bad?
The good outcomes outweighed the bad. Americans were able to obtain more resources such as land and gold which created more income. It allowed the population to spread out so cities weren't over populated and opened up more opportunities for jobs.
Was Jefferson justified in making the Louisiana Purchase?
President Jefferson endorsed the purchase but believed that the Constitution did not provide the national government with the authority to make land acquisitions. He pondered whether a constitutional amendment might be needed to legalize the purchase.
Was the Louisiana Purchase justifiable?
Final Reason Louisiana Purchase Was Justified The last reason we think the Loisiana Purchase was justified is it gave Loisiana complete control of New Orleans. This is good because it provided them territory for the westward expansion.
Was the Manifest Destiny justified?
The term "Manifest Destiny" was, in part, an expression of a genuine ideal on the part of Americans. But it was also a justification, in that they wanted territory and needed an excuse or justification for a push into territory that they did not control.
What were the positive and negative effects of westward expansion?
The positive effect of America's belief in manifest destiny is that it gained America more land and completed/helped bring America to what it is today. The negative effect of American's belief in manifest destiny is that it was more land to control for the US and the US had to fight 2 wars to gain the territory.
What are some positives of Westward Expansion?
Gold rush and mining opportunities (silver in Nevada) The opportunity to work in the cattle industry; to be a “cowboy” Faster travel to the West by railroad; availability of supplies due to the railroad. The opportunity to own land cheaply under the Homestead Act.
What are 3 negative effects of westward expansion?
Westward Expansion generally had negative effects on the Native Americans. Native Americans were forced to live on reservations. The buffalo, an important resource, experienced rapid population decline. Military conflict between Whites and Native Americans resulted in many deaths.
How did Jefferson justify the purchase?
As time for ratification of the purchase treaty grew short, Jefferson accepted his Cabinet's counsel and rationalized: "it is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; & saying to him when of age, I did this for your good."
Was the United States justified in buying the Louisiana Territory?
Final Reason Louisiana Purchase Was Justified The last reason we think the Loisiana Purchase was justified is it gave Loisiana complete control of New Orleans. This is good because it provided them territory for the westward expansion.
How did Jefferson justify the Louisiana Purchase?
As time for ratification of the purchase treaty grew short, Jefferson accepted his Cabinet's counsel and rationalized: "it is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; & saying to him when of age, I did this for your good."